<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Sitesquak</title>
    <link>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/</link>
    <description>Web Banter and Happenings</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>todd@sitesquad.net</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2008</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-09-25T22:56:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Real estate development for ExpressionEngine websites</title>
      <link>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/real-estate-development-for-expressionengine-websites/</link>
      <guid>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/real-estate-development-for-expressionengine-websites/#When:22:56:00Z</guid>
      <description>We&#39;re working on a new neighborhood for websites. More details to come, soon. 

PDF: Sitesquad Hosting for ExpressionEngine</description>
      <dc:subject>Hosting</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-09-25T22:56:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Need a web strategy? Go get some millinneals</title>
      <link>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/go-get-your-millinneals/</link>
      <guid>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/go-get-your-millinneals/#When:04:08:00Z</guid>
      <description>Young people get the web. Older people, not so much. It&#39;s that simple. Forrester Research has published a new report, “The Seven Tenets of the Information Workspace,” with the recommendation that businesses should seek out &quot;millennials,&quot; those born between 1980 and 2000, to help them make sense of Web 2.0 technologies and practices. Here&#39;s a post on ZDNet about the report.</description>
      <dc:subject>Web</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-11-29T04:08:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Our redesign and new services</title>
      <link>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/sitesquad-redesigns-and-launches-new-web-management-web-consulting-services/</link>
      <guid>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/sitesquad-redesigns-and-launches-new-web-management-web-consulting-services/#When:05:28:00Z</guid>
      <description>We launched a web redesign a little over a week ago, unveiling some new twists in the marketing of our services. Our business model hasn&#39;t changed, just our packaging. It&#39;s a good time to reset the table. Let&#39;s break down Sitesquad in simple terms.</description>
      <dc:subject>Sitesquad</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-11-12T05:28:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Google really wants you to know how easy SEO/SEM is</title>
      <link>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/google-really-wants-you-to-know-how-easy-seo-sem-is/</link>
      <guid>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/google-really-wants-you-to-know-how-easy-seo-sem-is/#When:16:11:00Z</guid>
      <description>It seems everytime I check in on the Google Webmaster Blog I find myself reading something to the effect that I just need to create good useful content to achieve betting search rankings. More recently, that&#39;s also become the message on the AdWords side with respect to ads and landing pages. How many times, in how many different ways, can they say, &quot;just create good content?&quot;</description>
      <dc:subject>Search</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-06-22T16:11:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>State of web marketing</title>
      <link>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/state-of-web-marketing/</link>
      <guid>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/state-of-web-marketing/#When:17:15:00Z</guid>
      <description>Interesting thoughts on the direction of Web marketing over at SearchEngineWatch.com
&quot;One of this things that struck me (again) while I was at Search Engine Strategies in New York earlier this month was that the world of search marketing, and Web marketing in general, is becoming more and more like old&#45;fashioned marketing.&quot; &#45; Eric Egne
Indeed, I think this is the reality, but I wonder how many marketers are still buying &quot;perception&quot; &#45; err, all the little tricks and gimmicks one thinks they can do with their site to generate business. 
Trust is at the Core of the New Web Marketing</description>
      <dc:subject>Managing</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-04-25T17:15:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Don&#8217;t build a CMS for content, alone</title>
      <link>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/dont-build-a-cms-for-content-alone/</link>
      <guid>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/dont-build-a-cms-for-content-alone/#When:02:32:00Z</guid>
      <description>Having to publish lots of content isn’t enough to make me want to build a custom CMS. There’s just too many good publishing systems already out there – ExpressionEngine (our fav), Movable Type, Wordpress, Drupal, the list goes on.</description>
      <dc:subject>Web</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-04-13T02:32:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>What&#8217;s good for the &#8220;Google,&#8221; isn&#8217;t good for the gander</title>
      <link>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/whats-good-for-the-google-isnt-good-for-the-gander/</link>
      <guid>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/whats-good-for-the-google-isnt-good-for-the-gander/#When:20:28:00Z</guid>
      <description>Apparently, the rules are different for the &quot;don&#39;t&#45;be&#45;evil&quot; empire. Google says not to scrape content from other sites. It&#39;s bad, and it doesn&#39;t serve your visitors. Seems like a peculiar stance for a company that scrapes with the audacity Google does.</description>
      <dc:subject>Search, Web</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-03-23T20:28:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Back to the Sitesquad proposition</title>
      <link>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/back-to-the-sitesquad-proposition/</link>
      <guid>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/back-to-the-sitesquad-proposition/#When:20:07:00Z</guid>
      <description>Let me get back to real the business proposition around here &#45; too much ranting and raving about other things. I was working on a project outline for a client and came up with several key objectives of the initiative which really help put our subscription service in context. I&#39;ll dive into those points, but first understand our subscriptions are geared for organizations with lots of work. They&#39;re not for companies just tip&#45;toeing into the Web.</description>
      <dc:subject>Subscriptions</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-03-08T20:07:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>How to $#@&amp;amp;#* up the franchise</title>
      <link>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/how-to-fuck-up-the-franchise/</link>
      <guid>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/how-to-fuck-up-the-franchise/#When:18:56:00Z</guid>
      <description>Pardon my French, but I get aggravated when I see companies pissing away their franchises because they&#39;re either lazy, they just don&#39;t get it anymore, or they&#39;re in&#45;different to what they know their customers need. It&#39;s 2007. If you&#39;re a player in tech or software, you don&#39;t get a pass for Web incompetence. You&#39;ve had ample time to figure out what your browser&#45;based customers need today? Who&#39;s pissing away their franchise? I can&#39;t say, in deference to friends.  But here&#39;s the deal.</description>
      <dc:subject>Business</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-03-02T18:56:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Google Apps vs. Microsoft Office Part 2</title>
      <link>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/google-apps-vs-microsoft-office-part-2/</link>
      <guid>http://www.sitesquad.net/squak/google-apps-vs-microsoft-office-part-2/#When:20:00:00Z</guid>
      <description>Back to the issue. I&#39;m not going to rehash all the talk around the Web on this subject. ZDNet offered a pretty good breakdown a few weeks ago, Google Office vs. Microsoft Office: What’s the end game?. But I do have some random thoughts, starting with the revelation that I bought the Google&#39;s enterprise edition last night for our business.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-02-27T20:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>